This caught my eye--you often see lists of the top [pick your number] best books. Why not a discussion of the worst of the lot (at least, in the opinion of this select group of critics)?
I can think of a few pretty awful candidates, but I refuse to name them if the authors are alive. I figure, why add to their troubles? Isn't the agony you go through to get (and stay) published bad enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment